Profile
The company has been listed listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange since 2006.
The main activities are:
- software and computer hardware consultancy
- production of software
- supply of software and hardware.
It provides comprehensive IT solutions and services for international financial institutions (Erste, Allianz, UniCredit, etc.), for the private sector enterprises, as well as for the public institutions of central and local administration. Its product portfolio comprises information systems for banks, insurance companies and construction firms, card transaction systems, healthcare information systems, data warehouses, Business Intelligence and e-Commerce solutions, reporting systems, and turn-key projects [Annual Report 2013 Asseco Poland].
The company is primarily active in Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Hungary.
The capital group of Asseco Central Europe incorporates the following companies:
 |
| structure [1Q2014 report] |
Slovanet was sold at the end of June, 2014 for €11m. The aquisition of Asseco Solutions from Asseco Dach S.A. for €13.8m in January, 2014 has added footprint in Germany, Switzerland and Austria.
Maybe the activitites become clearer with the following picture. It is sometimes difficult to understand what a software company actually does.
 |
| solutions and services [annual report 2013] |
P&L
| TTM | 2013 | 2012 | |
| total revenues | 134.9 | 131.3 | 134.4 |
| Gross Profit | 34.5 | 35.1 | 41.0 |
| Gross Profit Margin | 25.6% | 26.7% | 30.5% |
| EBITDA | 24.3 | 25.9 | 28.0 |
| EBITDA Margin | 18.0% | 19.7% | 20.8% |
| Ebit | 13.0 | 14.5 | 17.6 |
| Ebit Margin | 9.6% | 11.1% | 13.1% |
| Share in profits of associated companies | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Net Income | 9.8 | 11.3 | 14.2 |
| Operating Cash Flow before WC changes | 22.7 | 25.0 | 27.8 |
| Net Capital Expenditures | ? | -2.0 | 0.3 |
| Free Cash Flow | 22.7 | 27.0 | 27.4 |
Net capital expenditures are capital expenditures-depreciation+intangibe addition-intangible depreciation. Asseco CE is not growing at the moment. Necessary investments and depreciation seem to offset one another. I therefore use FCF=operating Cashflow before working capital changes for TTM period.
A breakdown of P&L per subsidiary looks as follows. Slovanet was sold.
"The negative phenomenon is decreasing project profitability. Last year we fully recorded the intensive pressure of the customers to reduce their own costs, which was negatively reflected in the reduction of our hourly rates, dropped revenues and change in the structure of revenues to the detriment of the lump sum payments. We had to deal with this reduction more intensively than in the past and focus rather on new customers and new projects of the existing customers. At present the income from the new projects amounts to 35-45% from the annual revenues when compared to 15-20% in the period from 2008 to 2011. New customers and new projects must be or had to be won in the tenders, while the main or even the only relevant criterion is the price (even with the commercial customers). It is extremely difficult to win such tenders and deliver the work for such low invoiced income and to avoid loss; this becomes even more difficult every year. For the reasons above our EBIT decreased when compared to 2012, i.e. our economic results dropped by almost 15%, a decrease of EUR 15 per invoiced EUR 100. It's a trend that we will have to face in the future. To achieve the same economic result in the absolute amount means to try to increase annual revenues compared to the past with lower profitability. And that means winning more and more new projects every year. "
"Sales revenues [for 2013] dropped as a consequence of the difficult economic situation in the region, and especially the political situation in the Czech Republic. The resulting stagnation in public administration procurements weighed on the financial results of Asseco Central Europe. Macroeconomic conditions caused the erosion of profit margins achieved on products and services. Therefore, Asseco Central Europe is now focused on looking for new customers."
The problem with reduced revenues from public institutions in the Czech Republic can bee seen on the revenue breakdown per sector:
Leverage
| 1Q2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 36.0 | 34.9 | 26.4 |
| Total liquidity | 36.0 | 34.9 | 26.4 |
| financial liabilities | 16.4 | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| Debt | 10.0 | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Minorities | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.1 |
| Total interest bearing liabilites | 30.2 | 15.0 | 15.7 |
| Net interest bearing liabilites | -5.8 | -19.9 | -10.7 |
| NIBL/EBITDA | -0.24 | -0.77 | -0.38 |
Increase of financial liabilities in 1Q2014 resulted from increase in liabilities due to acquisition of shares:
 |
| Financial liabilities Asseco CE 1Q2014 |
 |
| debt |
 |
| balance shhet Slovanet 2012 |
| 1Q2014 | 1Q2014 | ex Slovanet | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 36.0 | 45.8 | plus €11m -1.2m cash |
| Total liquidity | 36.0 | 45.8 | |
| financial liabilities | 16.4 | 16.4 | |
| Debt | 10.0 | 1.5 | minus €8.5m |
| Minorities | 3.7 | -0.3 | minus €8.2m*49% |
| Total interest bearing liabilites | 30.2 | 17.7 | |
| Net interest bearing liabilites | -5.8 | -28.1 | |
| NIBL/EBITDA | -0.24 | -1.62 | minus 7m EBITDA |
This looks even better. Asseco CE is nearly gross debt free.
Valuation
| TTM | ex Slovanet | ||
| Shares Outstanding | 21.36 | 21.36 | |
| Price PLN | 16.3 | 16.3 | |
| Price EUR | 3.9 | 3.9 | |
| Market Cap | 83.6 | 83.6 | |
| Net interest bearing liabilites | -5.8 | -28.1 | |
| Enterprise Value | 77.7 | 55.4 | |
| EBITDA | 24.3 | 17.3 | minus €7m |
| EBIT | 13.0 | 11.5 | minus €1.5m |
| FCF | 22.7 | ||
| Net Income | 9.8 | 9.0 | minus €0.8m |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.2 | 3.2 | |
| EV/EBIT | 6.0 | 4.8 | |
| Cash flow yield | 29.2% | ||
| PE | 8.5 | 9.3 |
One might have to adjust for the one-off sale of non-IT logistics projects in September 2013 with the impact on the net other operation income in the amount of €1.7m. The projects generated annual revenues in the amount of EUR 3.8 million and represented 115 employed persons in Czech Republic:
| TTM | ex Slovanet | ||
| Shares Outstanding | 21.36 | 21.36 | |
| Price PLN | 16.3 | 16.3 | |
| Price EUR | 3.9 | 3.91 | |
| Market Cap | 83.6 | 83.6 | |
| Net interest bearing liabilites | -5.8 | -28.1 | |
| Enterprise Value | 77.7 | 55.4 | |
| EBITDA | 22.4 | 15.4 | minus 1.9m |
| EBIT | 11.1 | 9.6 | minus 1.9m |
| FCF | 20.7 | minus 2.0m | |
| Net Income | 8.1 | 7.3 | minus 1.7m |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.5 | 3.6 | |
| EV/EBIT | 7.0 | 5.8 | |
| Cash flow yield | 26.6% | ||
| PE | 10.3 | 11.4 |
The company looks cheap. After the sale of Slovanet EV/EBITDA coincidently stays constant but EV/EBIT gets even lower. This looks like the future for Asseco CE is bad or Mr Market is wrong.
Asset allocation is not the problem either as the company pays a healthy dividend:
| Date | Dividend per share (EUR) | yield @3.91€ |
| 4/14/2014 | 0.37 | 9.46% |
| 16/04/2013 | 0.47 | 12.02% |
| 24/04/2012 | 0.66 | 16.88% |
| 5/5/2011 | 0.22 | 5.63% |
| 6/5/2010 | 0.22 | 5.63% |
Remuneration of Members of the Board of Directors for 2012 was €1.745m and €0.025m for the supervisory board.
Reasons for being cheap may be:
- Asseco Poland owns 93.51%, which leaves a float of just 6.49%*€83.6m mcap=€5.4m
- low liquidity of shares
- related party transactions may not be at arm's length at the expense of the minority investor
- revenue recognition may be too optimistic: "The progress of contract execution is measured as a percentage of the total estimated contract execution costs incurred from the date of contract conclusion to the date when the related revenues are determined, or as a proportion of the work completed out of the total work effort planned."
- customer's focus on price has already negatively impacted profitability and the company expects this trend to continue
- bad results 1Q2014 in Czech republic
My assumptions regarding cashflows (no net expenditures, ignoring WC changes) may be too optimistic but in my opinion Asseco CE is a cash cow. The increase in receivables is a little bit troubling though. The company is interesting for a basket approach of statistically cheap companies. A concentrated position is not warranted due to the lack of a moat.
I am long Asseco Central Europe.
Links
Asseco Central EuropeAsseco Poland
